SOURCES OF SHARIA LAW (ISLAMIC LAW)
All
religions have sets of codified laws, but they take on special importance for
the Islamic faith, since these are the rules that govern not only the religious
lives of Muslims but also form the basis of civil law in nations that are
Islamic Republics, such as Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran. Even in nations
that are not formally Islamic republics, such as Saudi Arabia and Iraq, the
overwhelming percentage of Muslim citizens causes these nations to adopt laws
and principles heavily influenced by Islamic religious law.
Islamic
law is based upon four main sources, outlined below.
I.
THE QURAN
Muslims
believe the Quran to be the direct words of Allah, as revealed to and transmitted
by the Prophet Muhammad. All sources of Islamic law must be in essential agreement
with the Quran, the most fundamental source of Islamic knowledge. The Quran is
therefore regarded as the definitive authority on matters of Islamic law and
practice. The Quran is aimed at establishing basic standards for Muslim
societies and guiding these communities in terms of their rights and
obligations. At the time of its revelation, it provided a set of progressive
principles. It advances values such as compassion, good faith, justice and
religious ethics. When the
Quran itself does not speak directly or in detail about a certain subject, only
then do Muslims turn to alternative sources of Islamic law.
II.
THE SUNNAH
Sunnah is
collection of writings documenting the traditions or known practices of the
Prophet Muhammad, many of which have been recorded in the volumes of Hadith literature. The resources
include many things that he said, did, or agreed to—mostly based on life and
practice based entirely on the words and principles of the Quran. During his
lifetime, the Prophet's family and companions observed him and shared with
others exactly what they had seen in his words and behaviors—in other words,
how he performed ablutions, how he prayed, and how he performed many other acts
of worship.
While the Quran was recorded within a relatively short time,
the recording of the Sunna took a much longer period. There is a significant
debate over the authenticity and accuracy of some of the Sunna and there have
been comments as to the possibility of fabrication in the recording of the
Sunna.
It was
also common for people to ask the Prophet directly for legal rulings on various
matters. When he passed judgment on such matters, all of these details were
recorded, and they were used for reference in future legal rulings. Many issues
concerning personal conduct, community and family relations, political matters,
etc. were addressed during the time of the Prophet, decided by him, and
recorded. The Sunnah can thus serve to clarify details of what is stated
generally in the Quran, making its laws applicable to real-life situations.
III.
IJMA' (CONSENSUS)
In
situations when Muslims have not been able to find a specific legal ruling in
the Quran or Sunnah, the consensus of the community is sought (or at least the
consensus of the legal scholars within the community). In order to
prevent controversy and contradictions in legal opinions, Muslim jurists
extensively refer to the notion of consensus (ijma). The concept of ijma is one
of those that are disputed in Islamic legal practice.
Interestingly, when speaking of ijma, Weiss noted “an arena
of much more pervasive inter-Muslim controversy, an arena in which the most
fundamental matters are debated.
The
Prophet Muhammad once said that his community (i.e. the Muslim community) would
never agree on an error.
The Ijma reflects the natural evolution and acceptance of
ideas in the life of the Muslim Umma, and ensures the correct interpretation of
the Qur’an and Sunnah. Then, it enhances the authority of rules that are of
speculative origin. For example, the prohibition of simultaneous marriage to
the close relative of one’s wife. Besides, it represents an authority of its own
right once it is establishe
IV.
QIYAS (ANALOGY)
In the absence of concrete answers from the Qur’an and
Hadith, Muslim jurists would look for an analogous situation in which a
decision had been made. In
cases when something needs a legal ruling but has not been clearly addressed in
the other sources, judges may use the analogy, reasoning, and legal precedent
to decide new case law. This is often the case when a general principle can be
applied to new situations.
For
example, when recent scientific evidence showed that tobacco
smoking is
hazardous to human health, Islamic authorities deduced that the Prophet Mohammad's
words "Do not harm yourselves or others" could only indicate
that smoking should be forbidden for Muslims.
Comments
Post a Comment